As an independent, self-financing publication, Blätter is a relative exception in the journals field. So far, it has not felt the impact of recession, says editor Daniel Leisegang, who sees the big challenges in generating demand for political content and keeping pace with media change.
Ninety-five per cent of the financing for Blätter für deutsche und Internationale Politik is through sales, with advertising revenue making up the rest. The journal receives no public funding – which makes it fairly exceptional among media of our type and is a pleasant situation to be in. Having said that, it does mean that we’re constantly looking for new products and ideas in order to continue to be able to self-finance.
Blätter‘s financial situation has not changed dramatically of late. Until now, at least, we haven’t felt the direct impact of the recession in Europe. Subscriptions have been steadily increasing for the last seven years or so. We currently have around 7000 subscribers; in the last few years this number has been increasing by an average of 300 a year.We have two types of subscription: a standard one and a reduced subscription for students and the unemployed. Public and university libraries can also order Blätter for a reduced price – though savings measures means library orders are declining. So far we have not been forced to launch a donation campaign or a campaign for so-called “solidarity subscriptions”.
Blätter is an independent publisher; in other words, the staff are the owners of the limited company at and the editors of the journal. We receive the normal tax rebates for companies while VAT on our products ranges from 7 to 19 per cent. We also receive postal rebates when we send journals in bulk, which saves distribution costs. This is an offer that applies to all publishers and media companies in Germany.
Overtime is the norm, although less so than a few years ago. On the other hand, we do benefit from our “self-exploitation” – we’ve been able to turn our hobby into a largely profitable and independent occupation. The core staff is supported by two interns (whose expenses we pay) and a part-time employee who deals with orders and customer enquiries.
I would say that the real problems for journals in Germany are not recession related, unless we’re talking about the slump in the ad market. For quite some time now, journals have found themselves facing two major challenges: on the one hand, the sharp decline in interest in specialist publications – particularly in the area of politics. Readers of traditional journals are quite literally dying out. Publishers are therefore having to attract new and younger readers. It’s not just a question of marketing, it’s also an editorial challenge. The quality of the content is crucial – it’s about publishing texts that can’t be found anywhere else. The other challenge is the “digital revolution”. Journals are having to react very quickly to new media and this can be costly and resource consuming. In both cases, I think, the Internet is competitor and opportunity.
What will developments in the next few years look like? When it comes to political topics, what’s available in traditional publications in is diminishing rapidly. This doesn’t just go for the daily and weekly press but periodicals as a whole. Many magazines can only survive with financial support – although they too are finding themselves confronted with decreasing readerships and need to react. My guess is that, in the future, products will become increasingly digitalized and that the market will shrink. The latter in particular is regrettable in terms of journalism and the public sphere.
Around a year-and-a-half ago we modernized Blätter‘s website completely. We now use the site above all as an advertising platform for the journal. That means that the majority of the content is provided for a fee: prices for articles range between one and three euros (micropayment). Print subscriptions automatically include online subscriptions. We also publish free content that we change constantly. This keeps the site fresh and allows us to react to daily journalistic developments. More and more, we find that our readers want to be able to buy the journal in digital format. We’re planning very soon to introduce digital products, including formats for tablets and e-books. This does not signal a wholesale shift from print to digital, however: the print journal remains the relevant format for Blätter.
As to whether we are noticing a decline in demand for the long-form text: no, quite the opposite. If anything, the demand for in-depth background information is increasing – not least because it is no longer met by the mainstream print media. Evidence of this are the various collaborations we have going with publishers, the larger blogs and other print media – not only advertising but also the translation and re-publication of texts.
As already mentioned, our self-financing model requires that we are constantly exploring new products and ideas. For several years now we’ve published books and we have made our archive from 1956 onwards available on DVD. In 2013 we are planning a series of large scale events in cooperation with a partner in Berlin and hope to be able to do this regularly in the future.
What role does partnership in a network like Eurozine play in economic and journalistic terms? In strictly economic terms, cooperation with Eurozine has not “paid off”: few subscriptions come through membership in the Eurozine network. However Eurozine helps Blätter to become better known internationally, above all in the English-speaking countries. We also use the network to keep informed about the contents of other partner journals. Eurozine’s aim to create a multilingual European public sphere is exciting and important. Perhaps it will create an awareness of the social necessity of publications such as ours. In any event, we could and should make more use of the exchange between the different European magazines – particularly in times of crisis, where Germans particularly tend to discuss Europe only among themselves.
Published 12 September 2012
Original in English
First published by Eurozine
Contributed by Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik © Daniel Leisegang / Eurozine
PDF/PRINT
After over 20 years of publishing for free, Eurozine needs your support to get through an exceptionally lean year.
Become a Patron and get exciting perks for your help!
Want to hear a human voice?
Listen and subscribe wherever
you get your podcasts.
Subscribe to know what’s worth thinking about.
State funding for cultural journals in the Scandinavian countries is based on the belief that plurality of opinion is essential. The ‘Nordic model’ can be transferred to settings where reservations about state interference in the media leave journals without a lifeline.
A Turkish literary institution turns 90: reflections on Varlık’s evolution and achievements, as well as notable omissions. Also: On the country’s loss of intellectual moorings under Erdoğan and why culture depends on ‘the suspension of power’.
