St. Petersburg Debate on Europe

Anna Akhmatova Literary and Memorial Museum, 15-18 May

Russia in Europe – Russia and Europe is the title of May’s Debate on Europe, which took place at the Anna Akhmatova Literary and Memorial Museum in Saint Petersburg from 15 to 18 May. The event is intended as a platform for communication about the forms and prospects of neighbourhood between Russia and Europe today.

Neighbourhood in Europe


This article is based on the author’s contribution to the Debates on Europe series, created by S. Fischer Foundation, the German Academy of Language and Literature, and Allianz Cultural Foundation.

The topic of the series is “Neighbourhood in Europe: Prospects of a common future”. The St. Petersburg Debate on Europe took place from 15 to 18 May 2016, with public sessions on the evening of 17 May. Read also:

Carl Henrik Fredriksson
In a backyard that doesn’t exist

Senad Pecanin
Bosnia in Ukraine

Bruno Schoch
In defence of the citizens’ nation

Taciana Arcimovic
Neighbourhood as an assertion of autonomy

Ivaylo Ditchev
Borders are back in fashion

Further information

In addition to the life and works of Anna Akhmatova, the museum’s exhibitions make reference to those of Osip Mandelstam, Nikolay Punin, Kazimir Malevich and Vladimir Tatlin. Nina Popova, the museum’s director, explains how the event’s venue offers an important context for the event: “Their creative minds perceived the European cultural space as a common area with a single set of artistic and moral values. At the same time, they were able to understand the complexity and uniqueness, the differences and similarities of European and Russian history in the twentieth century.”

Indeed, the Debate on Europe in Saint Petersburg is intended as a platform for communication about the forms and prospects of neighbourhood between Russia and Europe today. Highlights included two public debates chaired by Nikolay Solodnikov, who is deputy director of the Mayakovsky Central City Public Library and curator of the Open Library Dialogues; and the writer and translator Carl Henrik Fredriksson, a founder and the former editor-in-chief of Eurozine. They were joined by philosopher Michail Ryklin, colta.ru editor-in-chief Maria Stepanova and Osteuropa editor Volker Weichsel to discuss Russia in Europe; and by journalist, talk show host and economist Aleksander Archangelsky, archpriest Alexey Uminskiy and historian Marci Shore for a debate on Russia and Europe.

A view from the Anna Akhmatova Literary and Memorial Museum. Photo: akhmatova.museum. Source: akhmatova.museum

Eurozine is a media partner of the current Debates on Europe series, initiated by S. Fischer Foundation, the German Academy of Language and Literature, and Allianz Cultural Foundation. The theme of the series is Neighbourhood in Europe – Perspectives for a Common Future. Publishing highlights based on contributions to previous debates in this series include Taciana Arcimovic‘s Neighbourhood as an assertion of autonomy; Ivaylo Ditchev‘s Borders are back in fashion; and Senad Pecanin‘s Bosnia in Ukraine.

More information, including full programme: Russia in Europe – Russia and Europe

Published 2 May 2016
Original in English
First published by Eurozine

© Eurozine

PDF/PRINT

Newsletter

Subscribe to know what’s worth thinking about.

Related Articles

Cover for: Welcome to the dictator’s playground

Turkey is no longer a dissident safe haven. High-profile cases of outspoken exiles kidnapped or even killed by spies when in the country attest to the risks. Interviews with Iranian and Russian exiles reveal deteriorating circumstances, from visa refusal to societal racism, police persecution and serious abduction threats, exposing uncertain, shifting political ground.

Cover for: Internal empire

Internal empire

Osteuropa 1–3/2024

Why the Russian Federation is a de facto empire despite the 1993 constitution; why Putin’s imperial but anti-ideological variety of Russian nationalism dominates; why Chechnya remains an open wound on the body politic; and feeling the impact of the Putin regime’s clampdown on intellectual freedoms.

Discussion